Which 2 statements explain why the Contract Architect would be an appropriate Technical Co-ordinator?

• A. Has a good, technical understanding of the work of the other professionals engaged in the project.
• B. Is an authority on local planning applications.
• C. Has experience of working with the company previously.
• D. Has good leadership skills.
• E. Is an external consultant.

Using the Project Scenario and the additional information provided for
this question in the Scenario Booklet, answer the following questions
about Feasibility.
Remember to limit your answers to the number of selections requested in each question.
Which 2 statements describe the appropriate application of Agile Project Management when developing the Feasibility Assessment?

• A. The new Project Manager should NOT be involved in finalising the
  Feasibility Assessment.
• B. The Earth Excavations ' Head Gardener should contribute to the outline solutions considered for the gardens.
• C. The Architecture Angels ' Finance Director should approve the final
  Business Case as part of the Feasibility Assessment.
• D. The Timber Tigers ' Site Manager should be the sole approver of the finalised Feasibility Assessment before development commences.
• E. The different options should be presented to the ' Hoy for Hoy Hall ' Action Group for their feedback before the chosen outline solution is finalised.

As Sprint 5 comes to an end, the Infrastructure Delivery Team is facing delays due to:
. Heavy rainfall affecting the Wellness Garden.
. Local supplier issues causing material delivery delays.
Dependency on external contractors for hydrotherapy equipment.
The Operations Delivery Team is unable to finalize details of the hydrotherapy treatments without testing them in the context of the facilities being constructed. The marketing materials cannot be generated until this work is complete.
In addition to the Developers, the teams include:

(The Wellness Garden (a Should Have) is delayed. Sukra Aroon suggests a workaround, using the River Pool Patio instead, and classifying the Garden as a ' Won ' t Have this time ' .
Is this an appropriate suggestion?)

• A. No, because a Should Have requirement should NOT be removed unless it threatens the delivery of a Must Have.
• B. Yes, because unresolved dependencies justify removing requirements to prevent disruption.
• C. No, because workarounds reduce quality and undermine the business case.
• D. Yes, because reclassifying the garden reduces risk while maintaining an outdoor option.

Midway through Project Increment 4, a joint Sprint Retrospective is held with Developers from both Delivery Teams.
Some members from Marketing and IT, based in India, join via video conferencing.
Issues raised:
. Dependency management challenges
Concerns about AgilePM principle ' Demonstrate Control '
To address this, Mira Bachar and the Developers invite Hira and Sukra Aroon to help Delivery Teams understand the issues, assess the consequences, and collaborate on solutions that align with AgilePM and Scrum.
In addition to the Developers, the teams include:

(During the Sprint, Mira Bachar identified inconsistencies between what she wanted, expressed in Product Backlog items, and the Product Increments delivered by the Delivery Teams.
Which 2 of the following would be appropriate actions for Mira to take in the next Sprint?)

• A. Require detailed design documents for all Product Backlog items before development starts.
• B. Ensure consistent Product Backlog estimation using Planning Poker to improve predictability.
• C. Define clear acceptance criteria and provide practical examples for Backlog items.
• D. Increase her availability to engage in discussion, reviews and give her feedback.
• E. Assign a Business Analyst to translate Product Backlog items into structured requirements.